Amnesty International: EU refugee summit lacked courage, chaos will continue
European politicians have been criticized by human rights NGOs over the results of their extraordinary summit on migration. Amnesty International (AI) believes the summit's emphasis on protecting the EU's external borders ignores both the reality of the global migration crisis and those countries' obligations to offer protection to those who cannot find it elsewhere.
In its initial reaction to the summit, Human Rights Watch (HRW) expressed appreciation for the promises made to significantly increase aid to refugees living in camps in the Middle East. However, HRW emphasized that this aid is no substitute for the necessary measure of expanding legal routes to Europe for those who otherwise risk their lives by journeying to the EU.
"An ambitious, brave new approach is needed, but what we got is just another serving of a strategy that has already failed," said John Dalhuisen, AI's director for Europe. In a press release, Dalhuisen also expressed appreciation for the EU-28's decision to invest a billion euro into supporting UN efforts to aid refugees from Syria directly in its neighboring countries.
He was, however, disappointed by the other efforts announced at the summit. The AI representative believes EU country leaders should find a way to arrange for asylum-seekers to safely travel to Europe and should change the dysfunctional European asylum system.
AI believes the number of 120 000 asylum-seekers that the EU Member States have decided to redistribute according to quotas, against the will of a minority of countries, will basically not influence the situation in Greece and Italy. "The chaotic, tragic scenes we have followed in recent weeks will continue and and most probably get even worse," Dalhuisen warned.
Judith Sunderland of HRW said the decision to financially aid refugees in the Middle East is only worthwhile if the money gets there rapidly. Overall, however, she believes the summit was just more proof that "everyone is doing their best to rid themselves of responsibility and to emphasize border protection over basic humanity."
- European Association for the Defence of Human Rights: Europe, quo vadis?
- Influential Czech Social Democrat wants Human Rights Minister dismissed, exploits refugee crisis to attack Roma
- Human Rights Watch says Czech debate on migration would cause an uproar if understood in the West
- Czech Human Rights Minister: We do not want the fascisization of society
- Human rights and hate violence seminar at Czech Parliament attended by only one MP
- EU Fundamental Rights Agency to publish results of research with Roma and Travellers in six EU Member States
- Petr Torák: Hate crimes spiked in the UK after the Brexit referendum, what will the elections bring?
- Czech lower house will not discuss accepting unaccompanied minor refugees - ANO, Communists, SocDems and ultra-nationalists opposed it
- Iulius Rostas: Operationalizing the concept of anti-Gypsyism for policy design
- Commentary: Time for a European Union Army
- EU Court of Justice: EU Member State courts can instruct Facebook to delete illegal posts, including insults
- Czech PM says Government will not change the financing conditions for nonprofits drawing EU money
- Czech Finance Ministry proposes all EU financing for social projects be provided ex-post, which could cut nonprofits off from those resources
- Austria, Germany on track to employ half of the refugees who arrived during the migration crisis four years ago
- VIDEO: Brussels demonstration by Romani people
- EU anti-fraud authority Hungarian program for Roma supported by EU funds has never worked and should be investigated
- Czech EP elections won by governing ANO party ahead of the Civic Democrats and Pirates