Czech Constitutional Court upholds verdict in 2009 arson case
The Czech Constitutional Court (ÚS) has rejected a complaint filed by two of the perpetrators of an arson attack on a Romani home in the town of Vítkov (Opava district) in 2009. The court ruled that no violations of the Constitution had occurred during their trial and that the justice system had both proceeded correctly and made the correct decision.
Jaromír Lukeš and David Vaculík, currently serving 22 years in prison for racially motivated murder, filed the complaint. The other two men convicted of the crime, Václav Cojocaru and Ivo Müller, did not file complaints regarding their 20-year sentences.
ÚS spokesperson Miroslava Sedláčková informed the Czech News Agency of the court's decision today. The four men, all ultra-right sympathizers, attacked a house occupied by a large Romani family in the early morning hours of 19 April 2009.
The men threw Molotov cocktails through the windows. The house immediately went up in flames.
Three people suffered injuries, the most serious of them an infant named Natálie who was not yet two years old. She suffered burns over 80 % of her body.
The child survived thanks to good luck and top-quality medical care, but her health has been permanently damaged. According to both the Regional Court in Ostrava and the High Court in Olomouc, the perpetrators are guility of committing multiple counts of racially motivated attempted murder and vandalism.
Those verdicts were upheld without exception by the Czech Supreme Court. However, defense attorneys for the arsonists and several legal experts consider the legal qualification of the charges incorrect and the sentencing disproportionately strict given the circumstances and the outcomes.
The defense questioned the legal qualification of the charges in its constitutional complaint, warning of alleged gaps in the evidence, and pointing out the media pressure the justice system faced in the case. The ÚS, however, said the evidence was sound and the courts had proceeded objectively.
The ÚS also ruled that the live broadcast of the trial from the courtroom had not been a violation of the defendants' right to privacy. The court emphasized that any trial is, by its very nature, a public matter, even though the specific circumstances of each trial must always be taken into account.
In the Vítkov case, the broadcasting of the hearings was found to have had no influence on the fairness of the process as a whole. The ÚS judges also found that the sentencing had been properly reasoned.
The courts are said to have correctly taken into account the way in which the defendants had lived their lives prior to committing the crime, as well as the uncritical attitude they adopted toward committing it and the motivation that led them to perpetrate it. "It is precisely that motivation - the mere fact that the victims belonged to a different ethnicity, even though the defendants did not know them at all and had never had any conflict with them - that was one of the pivotal reasons for finding that the crime posed an extreme danger to society and deserved extraordinary sentencing," Sedláčková said.
Lukeš and Vaculík filed their complaint with the ÚS in 2012, which means it took longer than the average criminal case for the court to review it. The reason for the delay was an objection of bias filed against Chief Justice Pavel Rychetský.
The objection pointed to a 2010 television appearance by Rychetský. In that appearance, the Chief Justice said it was praiseworthy that the case of the Vítkov arsonists had come to trial so rapidly.
According to the Third Chamber of the Constitutional Court, which evaluated the objection of bias, Rychetský's statement did not represent an obstacle to his deciding the perpetrators' complaint. It was not possible to infer from that statement that Rychetský had expressed any judgment as to the defendants' guilt or innocence prior to receiving their complaint, which is why he was ultimately able to handle the case.
- Czech right-wing extremists march through town where Romani arson victims live
- Czech town, home to Romani arson victims, bans neo-Nazi march there
- Czech Republic: Five years on, Romani arson victims still live in fear
- Czech judge who sentenced Vítkov arsonists has been murdered
- Analysis: Czech media baiting Romani family attacked by ultra-right arsonists
- Czech Supreme Court upholds sentencing in Vítkov arson case
- Czech Republic: Infant arson victim undergoes yet another operation
- Czech Republic: Arson victim turns 4 , doctors consider her state of health miraculous
- Sentence reduced for one Vítkov arsonist, other sentences upheld
- Pavel Uhl: High Court verdict in Vítkov arsons expected tomorrow
- Appeal proceedings for four Vítkov arsonists start today
- Vítkov arson appeal hearing scheduled for 17 and 18 March
- Commentary: Czech Facebook and the Vítkov arson sentences
- Natálka's mother to the arsonists: Ask her for forgiveness yourselves
- Vítkov arson verdict: 22 years for three defendants, 20 years for the fourth
- Secretary to Czech President Klaus condemns TV coverage of Vitkov arson trial
- Verdict in Vítkov case expected on 20 October, two arsonists apologize
- Prosecution seeks extraordinary sentencing for three Vítkov arson defendants
- Benefit concert in Prague tonight for Natálka, victim of anti-Roma arson attack
- Attorney for the Vítkov arson victims: The defense pulled out all the stops
- Vítkov arson trial enters its final phase, but press can’t hear wiretap evidence
- Arson trial: Neo-Nazi refuses to testify, wiretaps show arsonists’ cynicism
- Arson trial: Dictaphones only from now on, broadcasting equipment not allowed
- Two witnesses in Vítkov arson case face prosecution for promoting Nazism
- Man who helped track down the Vítkov arsonists received threats
- Graffiti celebrating the Vítkov arsonists appears in Ostrava
- Vítkov trial: Did Vaculík download instructions for arson attack from the internet?
- Vítkov arson trial has seen its 12th day
- Arsonist was on welfare, spent more time with friends than with his child
- Vítkov arson trial: Summary of the first week
- Arson trial: Nazis blame each other, contradict themselves, were after “gypsies”
- Vítkov arsonists claim attack was meant to hit a storehouse of stolen goods
- One year after the arson attack in Vítkov, little Natálka is learning to walk
- Czech Police investigating hateful online comments inciting violence against Czech Radio reporter that were sparked by politician
- UK court sentences neo-Nazis for threats against Prince Harry because of his marriage to Meghan Markle
- Czech politician appeals sentence for his hateful remarks about minorities
- Czech prosecutor appeals after court acquits online hater of saying dark-skinned first-graders should be gassed to death
- Czech restaurant chain apologizes to Romani musician for refusal of service
- Czech town sees street fight, mayor writes about the "gypsy nuisance" - then ignores other violence involving non-Romani people
- Czech candidate shocked when online haters targeted her two-year-old
- Czech Police charge adults who assaulted Romani children with three felonies including racial defamation
- Czech restaurant says reservations, not racism, were why a Romani group was not seated despite empty tables
- Winner of Czech-Slovak singing competition "The Voice" subjected to racist attacks online
- Czech court acquits football hooligans accused of assaulting dark-skinned man on Prague tram, prosecutor appeals
- Czech Senator compares environmental, gender equality, multiculturalism advocacy to racism and totalitarianism at Holocaust site